Project Profile
Engaging fishermen to advance near-shore marine protection in Nova Scotia Halifax, NSCanadian Parks and Wilderness Society-Nova Scotia Chapter (CPAWS-NS): The mission of CPAWS-NS is to keep Nova Scotia wild. We protect, conserve, and restore biodiversity. We work towards collaborative and solution-orientated results to ensure the beauty and life-giving forces of wilderness persist into the future.
Need: $5000, Volunteers
"We need to empower fishermen to use their local knowledge and expertise to protect and restore local fisheries in order to support livelihoods for current and future generations." — Ashley Sprague, CPAWS NSNova Scotia is the only Canadian province without a coastal Marine Protected Area (MPA). With increasing threats of overfishing, industrial development, pollution and climate change, we urgently need to take steps to protect the productive waters around the province. Through collaboration with fishermen and government, our marine program has made significant progress to advance near-shore protected area planning in Nova Scotia.
Due in great part to community outreach, research and political pressure from CPAWS, Parks Canada is now assessing the Bay of Fundy to identify candidate National Marine Conservation Area sites. We are confident that Digby Neck and Islands will be among the final list of candidates. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans is currently exploring options for coastal MPA designation, and Port Joli is a top site under consideration. Opportunities exist to advance near-shore Marine Protected Area establishment through community-led conservation planning. With your help, this project will advance community conservation planning, influence decisions made by government and help move these sites toward protection more quickly.
Our program works directly with fishermen in the communities of Port Joli and Digby Neck and Islands to explore conservation options. Our community-based approach has led to strong, trusting relationships with community members and a solid understanding of current and historical local fisheries, ecosystem threats and community dynamics. We are now further engaging fishermen and other stakeholders to identify conservation priorities and develop conservation plans to protect and restore key habitats and local fisheries, which will ensure resources will be available to support livelihoods for future generations.
Raised: $35
Needed: $4965
Donate Now
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Skiing and Energy
Not easy skiing green: Is the eco-movement at ski areas legit?
ADAM WHITE
Posted: 01/01/2010 10:57:51 PM EST
From the Bennington Banner
For years, the only thing "green" about ski resorts was the small mountain of cash it took to visit one.
But 2009 saw significant strides made by Vermont ski areas to become more environmentally responsible, and their efforts seem to be paying off. Vermont was the only state with wins in all of the major categories for environmental excellence at this year’s National Ski Areas Association Convention (which was held, naturally, in Florida).
Stratton won for "Excellence in Energy Conservation & Clean Energy," thanks to its "broad, multi-pronged energy program" that reportedly reduced electricity use by 18 percent, propane consumption by 20 percent and fuel/diesel use by 19 percent during 2008; those reductions amount to the equivalent of 3,473 tons of carbon dioxide, according to the NSAA.
Okemo won for Environmental Education, while Stowe earned the Waste Reduction and Recycling award to complete Vermont’s sweep. The three resorts - along with Mount Snow, Bromley and four others in the state - also endorse the NSAA’s "Sustainable Slopes" program and Environmental Charter, which outlines principles of responsible planning and operation for ski areas.
This past November saw the Vermont ski industry’s first wind turbine spin to life, a modest Northwind 100 unit atop the Vista Peak at Bolton Valley. The turbine generates upward of 330,000 kilowatt hours of electricity per year (approximately the same amount of power used by 40-45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertisement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vermont households), providing roughly one-eighth of the resort’s electric power.
Bolton has also contracted Efficiency Vermont of Burlington to help re-work its snowmaking system, while cutting its nightly grooming fleet down by nearly 75 percent and streamlining the operation of its lift system to better fit customer need.
"We can’t keep pumping all of this carbon into the air, or running lifts with nobody on them," says Bolton’s president, George Potter. He goes on to say that support among Bolton passholders for the wind turbine program has been overwhelming.
"So many people have called me up to say ‘thank you,’ and to say that they feel good to be a part of something that is positive for the environment like this," Potter says.
But skeptics insist that the ski industry is using its "green movement" as more of a marketing campaign than anything else, and that the real motivation for increasing efficiency is the healthier profit margin that comes along with it. Those passholders at Bolton may derive some satisfaction from their connection to the resort’s wind initiative, but are they really just being sold a bill of goods with a lot of ecological window dressing?
"Energy is a huge factor at a ski resort," points out Scott Printz, chairman of the Bennington County Regional Commission’s Energy Committee. "If they can reduce their energy consumption, they can save a lot of money. But I’ve got to think that if it didn’t make sense in terms of their bottom line - and give them a wonderful little marketing tool to put out there at the same time - they wouldn’t do it.
"If there was an initiative that would have real value from an environmental standpoint but would cost them money, would they even consider it?"
Printz’s assessment of the situation gains ammunition from one aspect of Bolton’s future plans regarding wind power. Potter and company aspire to erect at least two additional, larger turbines within the next two years; the first would provide all of the power needed to run the resort, while the second would generate excess energy that could be sold to generate additional profit.
"We’re not trying to create a wind farm here; that’s not where we’re going," insists Potter. "It’s about doing things that are green and sustainable."
But if the second turbine would make Bolton self-sufficient in terms of electricity, why build a third?
"We’re a business, after all," Potter admits. "The goal of any business is to make money."
"Green" a fool’s gold?
While the effects of harnessing wind energy are real and tangible, other "green" initiatives within the ski industry come off as downright laughable. Using 10-percent recycled paper and organic, plant-derived ink to print your trail map is not doing a whole lot to reverse the environmental impact easily revealed with a walking tour of any modern commercial ski area.
Begin in the parking lot, where rows of gas-guzzling SUVs displaying a rainbow of out-of-state license plates evidence fuel consumption and exhaust emissions on a significant scale. If there is even a modest distance between the lot and the base area, chances are good that there is also a shuttle running between them.
Note the heating and power requirements of the expansive lodge, attached hotel and other buildings - not to mention the clusters of condominiums carved into the landscape, luxurious lodging that stands empty for months at a time during the off-season.
Turn your gaze along the lines of high-speed, high-capacity chairlifts that hang suspended above the trails - which are essentially linear scars clear-cut through what would otherwise be a wooded mountainside.
A resort staffer buzzes past on a snowmobile, leaving behind a trail of acrid-smelling exhaust from its two-cycle engine and the echo of its high-pitched whine.
Later, after the lifts have ground to a halt, the fleet of tank-like groomers will fire up and make its tracked assault on the mountain. Overhead, a network of snow guns continue churning, often day and night, to make up for the inconsistent and unpredictable snowfall provided by Mother Nature.
Make no mistake, such an operation provides the best possible experience for skiers: Convenient accessibility, pristine surfaces, comfortable amenities for between runs and after long days on the slopes. Of course these customers are aware of the impact they are making on the natural world; in fact, a 1999 survey by Ski Magazine suggested that skiers have a higher level of concern for the environment than enthusiasts of any other recreational sport.
But they are apparently not concerned enough to eschew the modern conveniences of skiing in order to protect the land, air, wildlife and natural resources in these areas. People still use their cars to travel daily, often over short distances, fully aware of the effect that exhaust emissions have on the Earth. Cigarette smokers still light up despite the millions of documented deaths linked to the habit.
As someone who loves to ski and has for decades, I am just as guilty as anyone else of taking advantage of the modern resort model with little regard for its negative impact on nature. I drive alone in my SUV - which seats five and gets roughly 15 miles per gallon - to go skiing during the week. I ride by myself on six-pack chairlifts, and during breaks I drink lodge coffee out of disposable cups. I use the electric hand dryer in the men’s room to de-fog my goggles.
I daydream about strapping a pair of skis onto my pack and climbing on foot through the backcountry, in order to "earn my turns" as the hardcore locals say. And while I may someday realize that ambition, the truth is that I will never stop participating in lift-serve skiing.
As one fellow skier joked, "It’s not like we’re going to magically teleport back through time a thousand years, and start shuffling through the woods on wooden skis like Leif Ericson in order to save the planet."
Likewise, George Potter at Bolton and the rest of the ski industry in Vermont, across the nation and worldwide will continue to keep their groomers running and snow guns pumping in order to provide the best possible experience to those visiting their mountains. Regardless of whether they keep one eye on their profit margin or some government incentive program, they can’t be expected to ignore available technology or other advancements within the sport.
And if they can do so in a more efficient and eco-friendly manner, with help from the spinning blades of a wind turbine up on the ridgeline or a biodegradable plastic spoon in the lodge, isn’t the end result really a net win for the buisnesses, the skiers and the planet?
"You just have to eat your soup fast, or your spoon will melt," says Potter with a laugh.
Adam White is Sports Editor of the Banner. He can be reached at awhite@benningtonbanner.com.
ADAM WHITE
Posted: 01/01/2010 10:57:51 PM EST
From the Bennington Banner
For years, the only thing "green" about ski resorts was the small mountain of cash it took to visit one.
But 2009 saw significant strides made by Vermont ski areas to become more environmentally responsible, and their efforts seem to be paying off. Vermont was the only state with wins in all of the major categories for environmental excellence at this year’s National Ski Areas Association Convention (which was held, naturally, in Florida).
Stratton won for "Excellence in Energy Conservation & Clean Energy," thanks to its "broad, multi-pronged energy program" that reportedly reduced electricity use by 18 percent, propane consumption by 20 percent and fuel/diesel use by 19 percent during 2008; those reductions amount to the equivalent of 3,473 tons of carbon dioxide, according to the NSAA.
Okemo won for Environmental Education, while Stowe earned the Waste Reduction and Recycling award to complete Vermont’s sweep. The three resorts - along with Mount Snow, Bromley and four others in the state - also endorse the NSAA’s "Sustainable Slopes" program and Environmental Charter, which outlines principles of responsible planning and operation for ski areas.
This past November saw the Vermont ski industry’s first wind turbine spin to life, a modest Northwind 100 unit atop the Vista Peak at Bolton Valley. The turbine generates upward of 330,000 kilowatt hours of electricity per year (approximately the same amount of power used by 40-45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertisement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vermont households), providing roughly one-eighth of the resort’s electric power.
Bolton has also contracted Efficiency Vermont of Burlington to help re-work its snowmaking system, while cutting its nightly grooming fleet down by nearly 75 percent and streamlining the operation of its lift system to better fit customer need.
"We can’t keep pumping all of this carbon into the air, or running lifts with nobody on them," says Bolton’s president, George Potter. He goes on to say that support among Bolton passholders for the wind turbine program has been overwhelming.
"So many people have called me up to say ‘thank you,’ and to say that they feel good to be a part of something that is positive for the environment like this," Potter says.
But skeptics insist that the ski industry is using its "green movement" as more of a marketing campaign than anything else, and that the real motivation for increasing efficiency is the healthier profit margin that comes along with it. Those passholders at Bolton may derive some satisfaction from their connection to the resort’s wind initiative, but are they really just being sold a bill of goods with a lot of ecological window dressing?
"Energy is a huge factor at a ski resort," points out Scott Printz, chairman of the Bennington County Regional Commission’s Energy Committee. "If they can reduce their energy consumption, they can save a lot of money. But I’ve got to think that if it didn’t make sense in terms of their bottom line - and give them a wonderful little marketing tool to put out there at the same time - they wouldn’t do it.
"If there was an initiative that would have real value from an environmental standpoint but would cost them money, would they even consider it?"
Printz’s assessment of the situation gains ammunition from one aspect of Bolton’s future plans regarding wind power. Potter and company aspire to erect at least two additional, larger turbines within the next two years; the first would provide all of the power needed to run the resort, while the second would generate excess energy that could be sold to generate additional profit.
"We’re not trying to create a wind farm here; that’s not where we’re going," insists Potter. "It’s about doing things that are green and sustainable."
But if the second turbine would make Bolton self-sufficient in terms of electricity, why build a third?
"We’re a business, after all," Potter admits. "The goal of any business is to make money."
"Green" a fool’s gold?
While the effects of harnessing wind energy are real and tangible, other "green" initiatives within the ski industry come off as downright laughable. Using 10-percent recycled paper and organic, plant-derived ink to print your trail map is not doing a whole lot to reverse the environmental impact easily revealed with a walking tour of any modern commercial ski area.
Begin in the parking lot, where rows of gas-guzzling SUVs displaying a rainbow of out-of-state license plates evidence fuel consumption and exhaust emissions on a significant scale. If there is even a modest distance between the lot and the base area, chances are good that there is also a shuttle running between them.
Note the heating and power requirements of the expansive lodge, attached hotel and other buildings - not to mention the clusters of condominiums carved into the landscape, luxurious lodging that stands empty for months at a time during the off-season.
Turn your gaze along the lines of high-speed, high-capacity chairlifts that hang suspended above the trails - which are essentially linear scars clear-cut through what would otherwise be a wooded mountainside.
A resort staffer buzzes past on a snowmobile, leaving behind a trail of acrid-smelling exhaust from its two-cycle engine and the echo of its high-pitched whine.
Later, after the lifts have ground to a halt, the fleet of tank-like groomers will fire up and make its tracked assault on the mountain. Overhead, a network of snow guns continue churning, often day and night, to make up for the inconsistent and unpredictable snowfall provided by Mother Nature.
Make no mistake, such an operation provides the best possible experience for skiers: Convenient accessibility, pristine surfaces, comfortable amenities for between runs and after long days on the slopes. Of course these customers are aware of the impact they are making on the natural world; in fact, a 1999 survey by Ski Magazine suggested that skiers have a higher level of concern for the environment than enthusiasts of any other recreational sport.
But they are apparently not concerned enough to eschew the modern conveniences of skiing in order to protect the land, air, wildlife and natural resources in these areas. People still use their cars to travel daily, often over short distances, fully aware of the effect that exhaust emissions have on the Earth. Cigarette smokers still light up despite the millions of documented deaths linked to the habit.
As someone who loves to ski and has for decades, I am just as guilty as anyone else of taking advantage of the modern resort model with little regard for its negative impact on nature. I drive alone in my SUV - which seats five and gets roughly 15 miles per gallon - to go skiing during the week. I ride by myself on six-pack chairlifts, and during breaks I drink lodge coffee out of disposable cups. I use the electric hand dryer in the men’s room to de-fog my goggles.
I daydream about strapping a pair of skis onto my pack and climbing on foot through the backcountry, in order to "earn my turns" as the hardcore locals say. And while I may someday realize that ambition, the truth is that I will never stop participating in lift-serve skiing.
As one fellow skier joked, "It’s not like we’re going to magically teleport back through time a thousand years, and start shuffling through the woods on wooden skis like Leif Ericson in order to save the planet."
Likewise, George Potter at Bolton and the rest of the ski industry in Vermont, across the nation and worldwide will continue to keep their groomers running and snow guns pumping in order to provide the best possible experience to those visiting their mountains. Regardless of whether they keep one eye on their profit margin or some government incentive program, they can’t be expected to ignore available technology or other advancements within the sport.
And if they can do so in a more efficient and eco-friendly manner, with help from the spinning blades of a wind turbine up on the ridgeline or a biodegradable plastic spoon in the lodge, isn’t the end result really a net win for the buisnesses, the skiers and the planet?
"You just have to eat your soup fast, or your spoon will melt," says Potter with a laugh.
Adam White is Sports Editor of the Banner. He can be reached at awhite@benningtonbanner.com.
Labels:
skiing Bennington Vermont Bolton
Let's Use Landfills as More Than a Dump
Blogger's Note: There are better placements spots for things like wind turbines, and landfills can have other green energy "generators" as well.
Supes to check out energy ideas regarding landfills
Staff Reports
Posted: 01/01/2010 06:24:52 PM PST
From The Sun San Bernardino
County-owned landfills could become the sites of solar arrays, wind turbines and other generators of renewable energy.
The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors agreed in December to see proposals from companies that would build renewable energy projects on top of more than 3,000 acres of county-owned landfill property.
"We have several thousand acres of land owned by our Solid Waste Management Division that are perfect for siting renewable energy projects," said First District Supervisor Brad Mitzelfelt. "This will not only help us meet the state's mandated renewable energy goals, but will create jobs and provide revenue to support the county's budget."
San Bernardino County operates six landfills and oversees several closed landfills. Both active and closed landfill sites could be home to renewable energy projects, according to a county-commissioned study.
The county, with its vast expanses of undeveloped desert landscape, is already home to several proposed renewable energy projects, including large-scale solar energy plants near Barstow and the Nevada Border.
"San Bernardino County is going to be a national leader in the development of renewable energy and it will be a key component of our economic future," Mitzelfelt said. "We need to be as creative as possible in encouraging development of this emerging and important industry."
The county has requested proposals for wind, solar and other types of renewable energy
Supes to check out energy ideas regarding landfills
Staff Reports
Posted: 01/01/2010 06:24:52 PM PST
From The Sun San Bernardino
County-owned landfills could become the sites of solar arrays, wind turbines and other generators of renewable energy.
The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors agreed in December to see proposals from companies that would build renewable energy projects on top of more than 3,000 acres of county-owned landfill property.
"We have several thousand acres of land owned by our Solid Waste Management Division that are perfect for siting renewable energy projects," said First District Supervisor Brad Mitzelfelt. "This will not only help us meet the state's mandated renewable energy goals, but will create jobs and provide revenue to support the county's budget."
San Bernardino County operates six landfills and oversees several closed landfills. Both active and closed landfill sites could be home to renewable energy projects, according to a county-commissioned study.
The county, with its vast expanses of undeveloped desert landscape, is already home to several proposed renewable energy projects, including large-scale solar energy plants near Barstow and the Nevada Border.
"San Bernardino County is going to be a national leader in the development of renewable energy and it will be a key component of our economic future," Mitzelfelt said. "We need to be as creative as possible in encouraging development of this emerging and important industry."
The county has requested proposals for wind, solar and other types of renewable energy
Nimby Opposition Can Force Variances
The Windflip is designed to transport and install floating wind turbines. (Image: Windflip)
Windflip vessel designed to deliver floating wind turbines to their deepwater moorings easily and efficiently.
The Hywind floating turbine–as well as a handful of other potentially-viable commercial floating wind turbine designs–has received loads of attention from renewable energy enthusiasts for good reason: floating turbines can be placed further offshore, in deeper water. Deep-water wind turbines tap stronger, more consistent wind resources and reduce the likelihood of NIMBY opposition.
But if floating wind turbines are to become cost competitive, certain manufacturing and delivery processes will need to be perfected to facilitate and hasten their adoption.
One such breakthrough design in floating wind turbine delivery and installation was developed by a team of graduate students at the institute of Marine Technology at the Norwegian School of Science and Technology (NTNU).
The Windflip is a vessel designed to take technologies like Hywind’s floating turbine out to sea from their construction or assembly point out to the location where they will be moored. To launch the wind turbines the entire vessel flips 90 degrees and releases the wind turbines in upright position. The Windflip vessel can take one or two floating turbines at a time.
Windflip vessel designed to deliver floating wind turbines to their deepwater moorings easily and efficiently.
The Hywind floating turbine–as well as a handful of other potentially-viable commercial floating wind turbine designs–has received loads of attention from renewable energy enthusiasts for good reason: floating turbines can be placed further offshore, in deeper water. Deep-water wind turbines tap stronger, more consistent wind resources and reduce the likelihood of NIMBY opposition.
But if floating wind turbines are to become cost competitive, certain manufacturing and delivery processes will need to be perfected to facilitate and hasten their adoption.
One such breakthrough design in floating wind turbine delivery and installation was developed by a team of graduate students at the institute of Marine Technology at the Norwegian School of Science and Technology (NTNU).
The Windflip is a vessel designed to take technologies like Hywind’s floating turbine out to sea from their construction or assembly point out to the location where they will be moored. To launch the wind turbines the entire vessel flips 90 degrees and releases the wind turbines in upright position. The Windflip vessel can take one or two floating turbines at a time.
Scenic Beauty and Wind Turbines
Blogger's Note: This is an area of special importance to me, as Digby Neck is an area of scenic beauty and is a nature area, and as such is important to tourism. These types of areas should be kept pristine. We don't-and won't- have many nature areas left in this world, and Digby Neck's pristine nature area, as many other such areas in the world, are important economically to the communities that live here.
Wind Watch: Industrial Wind Energy News
filed: January 1, 2010 • Virginia
A towering controversy: wind turbines proposed on East River Mountain
Credit: By CHARLES OWENS, Bluefield Daily Telegraph, www.bdtonline.com, 29 December 2009
The concept of going green took on a whole new meaning in 2009 for the region. With the Obama administration pushing new clean energy sources, the scenic beauty of East River Mountain was suddenly threatened, and the greater Bluefield region was divided by a towering controversy.
Dominion and BP Wind Energy North America announced they had purchased a large track of land along the ridgelines of East River Mountain with the objective of constructing as many as 60, 400-foot tall windmills. The news quickly divided the region. Some welcomed the announcement of the wind turbines, and the promise of a new and clean energy source for the region. However, others strongly objected, and warned the giant turbines would devastate the scenic beauty of East River Mountain, harm the environment, kill birds, cause property rates to plummet and cause potential harm to nearby residences and schools.
Caught in the middle of the controversy was the Tazewell County Board of Supervisors, who scrambled to develop a proposed ridgeline construction ordinance. Tazewell County has no current zoning laws. Although the wind turbines aren’t proposed for the municipal limits of Bluefield, Va., the Bluefield, Va. Town Council still passed a similar ordinance regulating the development of tall structures in the town. However, the supervisors were slow to act on the proposed ridgeline ordinance, and even opted to delay a second public hearing on the revised ridgeline plan until Tuesday, Jan. 12, at 6:15 p.m. at Tazewell Middle School.
While Tazewell County was slow to make a decision, neighboring Wise County gave a green light of approval to a similar wind turbine farm also proposed by Dominion and BP. While they await a decision by Tazewell County, officials with Dominion and BP are continuing a number of studies on East River Mountain.
A meteorological tower to study wind speed and direction has already been erected on East River Mountain. A number of geo-technical studies, along with wildlife and avian studies, are also continuing at the Tazewell County site, according to officials with Dominion.
Wind Watch: Industrial Wind Energy News
filed: January 1, 2010 • Virginia
A towering controversy: wind turbines proposed on East River Mountain
Credit: By CHARLES OWENS, Bluefield Daily Telegraph, www.bdtonline.com, 29 December 2009
The concept of going green took on a whole new meaning in 2009 for the region. With the Obama administration pushing new clean energy sources, the scenic beauty of East River Mountain was suddenly threatened, and the greater Bluefield region was divided by a towering controversy.
Dominion and BP Wind Energy North America announced they had purchased a large track of land along the ridgelines of East River Mountain with the objective of constructing as many as 60, 400-foot tall windmills. The news quickly divided the region. Some welcomed the announcement of the wind turbines, and the promise of a new and clean energy source for the region. However, others strongly objected, and warned the giant turbines would devastate the scenic beauty of East River Mountain, harm the environment, kill birds, cause property rates to plummet and cause potential harm to nearby residences and schools.
Caught in the middle of the controversy was the Tazewell County Board of Supervisors, who scrambled to develop a proposed ridgeline construction ordinance. Tazewell County has no current zoning laws. Although the wind turbines aren’t proposed for the municipal limits of Bluefield, Va., the Bluefield, Va. Town Council still passed a similar ordinance regulating the development of tall structures in the town. However, the supervisors were slow to act on the proposed ridgeline ordinance, and even opted to delay a second public hearing on the revised ridgeline plan until Tuesday, Jan. 12, at 6:15 p.m. at Tazewell Middle School.
While Tazewell County was slow to make a decision, neighboring Wise County gave a green light of approval to a similar wind turbine farm also proposed by Dominion and BP. While they await a decision by Tazewell County, officials with Dominion and BP are continuing a number of studies on East River Mountain.
A meteorological tower to study wind speed and direction has already been erected on East River Mountain. A number of geo-technical studies, along with wildlife and avian studies, are also continuing at the Tazewell County site, according to officials with Dominion.
Friday, January 1, 2010
Industrial Turbines/Living Creatures/Legal Action
From Industrial Wind Action Group
Highland County Supervisors liable for non-compliance with Endangered Species Act - letter
December 28, 2009 by James T. Rodier
Summary:
Wood Rogers PLC, the Roanoke law firm representing Highland Citizens, has advised the Highland County Board of Supervisors that allowing Highland New Wind Development to proceed without the Incidental Take Permit (ITP) required by the Endangered Species Act will place the county in legal jeopardy. The letter by Attorney James T. Rodier which details the supporting law can be accessed by clicking on the link(s) at the bottom of this page.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wood Rogers PLC, the Roanoke law firm representing Highland Citizens, has advised the Highland County Board of Supervisors that allowing Highland New Wind Development to proceed without the Incidental Take Permit (ITP) required by the Endangered Species Act will place the county in legal jeopardy. The Highland supervisors have ignored previous warnings on the advice of the county's attorney.
The new warning follows the recent federal court ruling requiring Chicago-based Invenergy Inc., to stop further construction of its Beech Ridge Project in nearby Greenbrier County, WV and to dramatically curtail operation of 40 completed turbines until the required ITP permit is obtained.
As outlined in the Woods Rogers letter, the issues related to Highland New Wind Development, which has started site preparation without an ITP, are even-more compelling.
Whereas the Beech Ridge project threatens one endangered bat species, the Highland project threatens two endangered bat species and both bald and golden eagles. Moreover, unlike the the Beech Ridge case where only the developer was responsible for compliance, in the Highland case, both the developer and the authorizing local officials are responsible for compliance.
Both the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) have advised Highland New Wind to obtain an ITP before proceeding. Based on the importance of the site as a migratory pathway for birds and bats, the VDGIF contended in testimony presented to the State Corporation Commission that the project may result in the highest mortality rates for any wind energy project in the eastern U.S.
Web link: http://www.vawind.org/
Highland County Supervisors liable for non-compliance with Endangered Species Act - letter
December 28, 2009 by James T. Rodier
Summary:
Wood Rogers PLC, the Roanoke law firm representing Highland Citizens, has advised the Highland County Board of Supervisors that allowing Highland New Wind Development to proceed without the Incidental Take Permit (ITP) required by the Endangered Species Act will place the county in legal jeopardy. The letter by Attorney James T. Rodier which details the supporting law can be accessed by clicking on the link(s) at the bottom of this page.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wood Rogers PLC, the Roanoke law firm representing Highland Citizens, has advised the Highland County Board of Supervisors that allowing Highland New Wind Development to proceed without the Incidental Take Permit (ITP) required by the Endangered Species Act will place the county in legal jeopardy. The Highland supervisors have ignored previous warnings on the advice of the county's attorney.
The new warning follows the recent federal court ruling requiring Chicago-based Invenergy Inc., to stop further construction of its Beech Ridge Project in nearby Greenbrier County, WV and to dramatically curtail operation of 40 completed turbines until the required ITP permit is obtained.
As outlined in the Woods Rogers letter, the issues related to Highland New Wind Development, which has started site preparation without an ITP, are even-more compelling.
Whereas the Beech Ridge project threatens one endangered bat species, the Highland project threatens two endangered bat species and both bald and golden eagles. Moreover, unlike the the Beech Ridge case where only the developer was responsible for compliance, in the Highland case, both the developer and the authorizing local officials are responsible for compliance.
Both the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) have advised Highland New Wind to obtain an ITP before proceeding. Based on the importance of the site as a migratory pathway for birds and bats, the VDGIF contended in testimony presented to the State Corporation Commission that the project may result in the highest mortality rates for any wind energy project in the eastern U.S.
Web link: http://www.vawind.org/
Recreational Areas Matter
Story posted Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Resident Fights Plan To Plop Wind Turbines On Lake Michigan
By TODD WESSELL Journal & Topics Editor
For the last 35 years, longtime Des Plaines resident Emil Schwarz has regularly driven south around Lake Michigan and straight north on Highway 31 to his small home in Pentwater, Michigan.
Pentwater, with its population of approximately 1,000, is a scenic, quiet village known for its summer music concerts at the village green and its close proximity to Lake Michigan.
If a newly-formed company has its way, however, Schwarz and many other local residents believe Pentwater and the 100-mile long coastal stretch from Muskegon on the south to Ludington on the north will dramatically alter the area for the worse.
Scandia Wind Offshores (SWO) is hoping to apply for state lease permits sometime in the first quarter of 2010 to develop a huge wind farm along the western shoreline of Lake Michigan. If all the necessary permits are granted following a process that could take years, the coastal landscape in that region will be filled with as many as 200 rotating, white wind turbines. Plans call for the windmills to jut out of the water at a maximum location of 3.7 miles from land.
The purpose of the billion-dollar project is to let the west and southwesterly winds generate electricity that eventually could serve large urban centers such as Detroit and Chicago. The spot across Pentwater is considered ideal because of wind speeds that can regularly reach 20 mph, which are normally only attainable in states such as North Dakota and Texas.
A similar kind of wind farm is located along I-65 north of Indianapolis. Unlike the proposed development, the Indiana operation is located on land.
The proposal has created an abundance of controversy pitting those who want to leave the lake undisturbed against others who believe a wind farm is an ideal way to generate cheap, environmentally clean electricity with little disruption.
"I don't like to see anything on the lake," said Schwarz during a telephone interview with the Journal & Topics Newspapers last week. "It's such a great asset."
Schwarz said that while his home is not directly located on Lake Michigan, he believes allowing 200 wind turbines to be erected and easily observed from the shoreline is wrong.
A Des Plaines resident for the last 40 years, Schwarz values the quality time he spends in his quiet west central Michigan home.
"It's like going to the beach and seeing wind turbines out there," Schwarz added. He has weighed in on the issue by voicing his concerns in local newspapers and will continue to do so as the process of allowing or rejecting the proposal runs its course.
Scandia is in the process of trying to gauge local opinion and support before it moves forward.
More public meetings are scheduled in mid-January.
Resident Fights Plan To Plop Wind Turbines On Lake Michigan
By TODD WESSELL Journal & Topics Editor
For the last 35 years, longtime Des Plaines resident Emil Schwarz has regularly driven south around Lake Michigan and straight north on Highway 31 to his small home in Pentwater, Michigan.
Pentwater, with its population of approximately 1,000, is a scenic, quiet village known for its summer music concerts at the village green and its close proximity to Lake Michigan.
If a newly-formed company has its way, however, Schwarz and many other local residents believe Pentwater and the 100-mile long coastal stretch from Muskegon on the south to Ludington on the north will dramatically alter the area for the worse.
Scandia Wind Offshores (SWO) is hoping to apply for state lease permits sometime in the first quarter of 2010 to develop a huge wind farm along the western shoreline of Lake Michigan. If all the necessary permits are granted following a process that could take years, the coastal landscape in that region will be filled with as many as 200 rotating, white wind turbines. Plans call for the windmills to jut out of the water at a maximum location of 3.7 miles from land.
The purpose of the billion-dollar project is to let the west and southwesterly winds generate electricity that eventually could serve large urban centers such as Detroit and Chicago. The spot across Pentwater is considered ideal because of wind speeds that can regularly reach 20 mph, which are normally only attainable in states such as North Dakota and Texas.
A similar kind of wind farm is located along I-65 north of Indianapolis. Unlike the proposed development, the Indiana operation is located on land.
The proposal has created an abundance of controversy pitting those who want to leave the lake undisturbed against others who believe a wind farm is an ideal way to generate cheap, environmentally clean electricity with little disruption.
"I don't like to see anything on the lake," said Schwarz during a telephone interview with the Journal & Topics Newspapers last week. "It's such a great asset."
Schwarz said that while his home is not directly located on Lake Michigan, he believes allowing 200 wind turbines to be erected and easily observed from the shoreline is wrong.
A Des Plaines resident for the last 40 years, Schwarz values the quality time he spends in his quiet west central Michigan home.
"It's like going to the beach and seeing wind turbines out there," Schwarz added. He has weighed in on the issue by voicing his concerns in local newspapers and will continue to do so as the process of allowing or rejecting the proposal runs its course.
Scandia is in the process of trying to gauge local opinion and support before it moves forward.
More public meetings are scheduled in mid-January.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
