From thisishullandeastriding.co.uk
Anger at Holderness wind farm cash offer
Saturday, December 05, 2009,
An energy company's offer to pay £70,000 to a Holderness community as part its wind farm plans have been likened to "trying to buy democracy"
Energiekontor UK is offering a £70,000 lump sum to the community fund if its plans for a three-turbine development at Monkwith, near Tunstall, are approved.
The company argues that amount would be the total needed to take the matter to an appeal if rejected and feels this would be a better way of using the cash.
It would be on top of the annual contribution the company would make to a community fund.
But councillors and local residents have slammed the proposal as "unethical".
Chair of Hilston and Tunstall Residents' Association, Jackie Cracknell, said: "I think this is inducing the decision makers into a positive decision for them and is unethical.
"Some may consider this to be a generous offer but the people I represent are not happy about it. These could be considered dirty tactics.
"But I have faith in the planning process in the East Riding.
"Councillors are the last bastion of hope and I feel they, and the officers will make a balanced decision."
Fellow resident Dr Brian Wells was equally scathing
He said: "I don't think the company is doing anything illegal but it strikes me the offer could deny people the full planning procedure and it's an unethical approach.
"It's a disgrace to be honest."
Chair of South Holderness Opposes Wind Turbines (Showt) Cherie Blenkin expressed her concern.
"You cannot put a price on democracy," she said. "It cannot be bought.
"It's a democratic right to object and if it costs money, so be it."
Local councillor Richard Stead added: "I think this is diabolical. It's an attempt almost to bribe democracy in my view."
Roos Parish Council chairman David Winter is also angered by the offer.
He said: "I think this is like immoral blackmail and it unacceptable."
East Riding Council leader Stephen Parnaby believes the move by Energiekontor is misplaced.
He said: "Monetary offers just have no relevance to the planning process.
"I don't think this is a smart move and hasn't done the company any favours.
"It just adds doubts to the planning process and puts more pressure on the decision makers."
The Monkwith application was deferred by the East Riding planning committee in October, despite being recommended for approval by planning officers.
In a statement, Energiekontor insisted the offer is a sensible approach and shows goodwill.
Project manager Chris Grainey said:
"It is accepted that planning appeals are a costly affair for both the council and the developer.
"If planning permission is forthcoming without the need for an appeal, Energiekontor is prepared to offer an additional one-off payment of £70,000 in the first year of the community fund to give it a
good start in supporting worthy projects in the local area.
"There would also be the usual annual £12,000 to £15,000 payment into the community fund.
"If the planning committee accepts the planning officer's recommendation for approval then there will be no need for an appeal and the tax payers in the East Riding will not burdened with the £70,000 cost of defending another wind farm appeal."
The Monkwith proposal is likely to be re-considered by the planning committee on Thursday.
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Denmark's Green Credentials
From the L.A. Times
Denmark's green credentials obscure some unpleasant facts
Though lauded for adopting wind power, its high recycling rate and its progressive policies, Denmark generates the most waste per capita in the EU and most of its energy still comes from coal.
Copenhagen, with its network of bicycle lanes, encourages residents to cut back on driving. Still Denmark is a highly consumerist society, experts say, pointing to the large amount of waste generated per capita: 1,762 pounds. (Tariq Mikkel Khan / Associated Press)
December 6, 2009
Reporting from Copenhagen - Something is rotting in the state of Denmark. Lots of things, actually, and it's a bit of an embarrassment for this Scandinavian nation as it prepares to host a widely anticipated global environmental summit this week.
Denmark is proud of its image as one of the greenest countries in the world; it's probably why it was chosen as the site of the 15th United Nations Conference on Climate Change.
But beneath the gloss lurk some inconvenient truths, including the fact that, pound for pound, Denmark produces more trash per capita than any other country in the 27-member European Union.
To be fair, the Danes are far more eco-friendly in terms of what they do with all that rubbish. A good portion of it is gardening waste, rather than soda cans and the like. Recycling rates are extremely high, and enormous incinerators around the country don't just burn trash but convert it into energy. About 5% of garbage ends up in landfills, compared with 54% in the United States.
Denmark has certainly made important strides in tapping wind energy and encouraging Copenhagen residents to abandon their cars by providing an extensive network of bicycle lanes throughout the city.
The country also is one of the most energy efficient. Officials proudly point out that their economy has managed to grow 70% since 1980 while keeping electricity consumption nearly stable.
Yet beneath that lies another unhappy reality. The Danish may lead the world in producing wind turbines, but much of their power still comes from coal-fired plants, major emitters of greenhouse gases.
Wind furnishes about 20% of the electricity supply -- an impressive proportion compared with other nations, but actually less than what many Danes think is the case.
"There are many myths about Denmark," Lidegaard said. "Yes, we have a lot of wind [power], and we are good at that. But it's still very, very little compared with coal."
When it comes to individual behavior, Danes exhibit plenty of the same tendencies as residents of other rich but less environmentally sensitive nations.
This remains a highly consumerist society. One of Copenhagen's biggest attractions is Stroget, billed as the world's longest pedestrian shopping street. Souvenir shops, luxury stores, high-end boutiques featuring Danish design and cafes peddling $7 cups of cappuccino attract throngs of residents and tourists.
Despite warnings from environmentalists that such consumption isn't sustainable in the long term, personal spending remains a popular pastime.
So is eating plenty of meat.
Meat consumption has been linked to climate change because of widespread deforestation to create pastureland or to grow feed crops and because of the gases, such as methane, released into the atmosphere by belching, flatulent livestock. In an analysis of worldwide meat-eating trends spanning 40 years, the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization concluded that Denmark topped the carnivore list.
In 2002, the last year of the study, the average Dane consumed a whopping 321 pounds of meat -- nearly a pound a day. For Americans, the figure was 275 pounds.
Lidegaard says that Denmark's reputation as a world leader in other "green" sectors may have blinded Danes to issues closer to home, even in their own kitchens.
"We have been so happy and self-satisfied about our energy system that we have completely forgotten that before we begin to use energy, before we begin to consume, we could do a lot of things to cut down our footprint on nature," he said.
Here in Copenhagen, the Amagerforbraending plant is one of the city's two principal incineration centers. It receives huge mounds of detritus every day out of dumpsters serving more than half a million residents, garbage that either can't be recycled or that residents didn't bother to sort.
Monster ovens burn the stuff at temperatures in excess of 1,700 degrees; cleansing agents remove toxic gases and other chemicals before the smoke billows out of a 500-foot-tall smokestack.
In 2007, the center incinerated 463,000 tons of rubbish. But the plant was able to convert that trash into energy using steam from water heated in the ovens. About 80% was fed into the municipal heating system, and 20% went into the electricity grid.
"It's obvious that it's a smart thing to take waste and turn it into energy," said Esben Norrbom, a consultant at the plant. "You take care of two problems at once."
But, according to the Danish government's own "hierarchy of waste," recycling and incineration should be subordinate to cutting down on waste production.
One thing, though, that's certain not to improve the numbers for Denmark: the thousands of diplomats, negotiators, experts, academics, scientists, activists and journalists converging on Copenhagen for nearly two weeks.
They may be coming to save the planet. But they'll leave behind tons of extra trash.
henry.chu@latimes.com
Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times
Denmark's green credentials obscure some unpleasant facts
Though lauded for adopting wind power, its high recycling rate and its progressive policies, Denmark generates the most waste per capita in the EU and most of its energy still comes from coal.
Copenhagen, with its network of bicycle lanes, encourages residents to cut back on driving. Still Denmark is a highly consumerist society, experts say, pointing to the large amount of waste generated per capita: 1,762 pounds. (Tariq Mikkel Khan / Associated Press)
December 6, 2009
Reporting from Copenhagen - Something is rotting in the state of Denmark. Lots of things, actually, and it's a bit of an embarrassment for this Scandinavian nation as it prepares to host a widely anticipated global environmental summit this week.
Denmark is proud of its image as one of the greenest countries in the world; it's probably why it was chosen as the site of the 15th United Nations Conference on Climate Change.
But beneath the gloss lurk some inconvenient truths, including the fact that, pound for pound, Denmark produces more trash per capita than any other country in the 27-member European Union.
To be fair, the Danes are far more eco-friendly in terms of what they do with all that rubbish. A good portion of it is gardening waste, rather than soda cans and the like. Recycling rates are extremely high, and enormous incinerators around the country don't just burn trash but convert it into energy. About 5% of garbage ends up in landfills, compared with 54% in the United States.
Denmark has certainly made important strides in tapping wind energy and encouraging Copenhagen residents to abandon their cars by providing an extensive network of bicycle lanes throughout the city.
The country also is one of the most energy efficient. Officials proudly point out that their economy has managed to grow 70% since 1980 while keeping electricity consumption nearly stable.
Yet beneath that lies another unhappy reality. The Danish may lead the world in producing wind turbines, but much of their power still comes from coal-fired plants, major emitters of greenhouse gases.
Wind furnishes about 20% of the electricity supply -- an impressive proportion compared with other nations, but actually less than what many Danes think is the case.
"There are many myths about Denmark," Lidegaard said. "Yes, we have a lot of wind [power], and we are good at that. But it's still very, very little compared with coal."
When it comes to individual behavior, Danes exhibit plenty of the same tendencies as residents of other rich but less environmentally sensitive nations.
This remains a highly consumerist society. One of Copenhagen's biggest attractions is Stroget, billed as the world's longest pedestrian shopping street. Souvenir shops, luxury stores, high-end boutiques featuring Danish design and cafes peddling $7 cups of cappuccino attract throngs of residents and tourists.
Despite warnings from environmentalists that such consumption isn't sustainable in the long term, personal spending remains a popular pastime.
So is eating plenty of meat.
Meat consumption has been linked to climate change because of widespread deforestation to create pastureland or to grow feed crops and because of the gases, such as methane, released into the atmosphere by belching, flatulent livestock. In an analysis of worldwide meat-eating trends spanning 40 years, the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization concluded that Denmark topped the carnivore list.
In 2002, the last year of the study, the average Dane consumed a whopping 321 pounds of meat -- nearly a pound a day. For Americans, the figure was 275 pounds.
Lidegaard says that Denmark's reputation as a world leader in other "green" sectors may have blinded Danes to issues closer to home, even in their own kitchens.
"We have been so happy and self-satisfied about our energy system that we have completely forgotten that before we begin to use energy, before we begin to consume, we could do a lot of things to cut down our footprint on nature," he said.
Here in Copenhagen, the Amagerforbraending plant is one of the city's two principal incineration centers. It receives huge mounds of detritus every day out of dumpsters serving more than half a million residents, garbage that either can't be recycled or that residents didn't bother to sort.
Monster ovens burn the stuff at temperatures in excess of 1,700 degrees; cleansing agents remove toxic gases and other chemicals before the smoke billows out of a 500-foot-tall smokestack.
In 2007, the center incinerated 463,000 tons of rubbish. But the plant was able to convert that trash into energy using steam from water heated in the ovens. About 80% was fed into the municipal heating system, and 20% went into the electricity grid.
"It's obvious that it's a smart thing to take waste and turn it into energy," said Esben Norrbom, a consultant at the plant. "You take care of two problems at once."
But, according to the Danish government's own "hierarchy of waste," recycling and incineration should be subordinate to cutting down on waste production.
One thing, though, that's certain not to improve the numbers for Denmark: the thousands of diplomats, negotiators, experts, academics, scientists, activists and journalists converging on Copenhagen for nearly two weeks.
They may be coming to save the planet. But they'll leave behind tons of extra trash.
henry.chu@latimes.com
Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times
Trash on Sandy Cove Beach
Gerald Graham
This video shows the neat pile of garbage we collected off the beach on Thanksgiving Day, Oct. 12, 2009, and left by the side of the road for pickup by the municipal authorities. It took the two of...
This video shows the neat pile of garbage we collected off the beach on Thanksgiving Day, Oct. 12, 2009, and left by the side of the road for pickup by the municipal authorities. It took the two of us approximately one hour to assemble this garbage, which littered the beach. We understaand that the locals periodically assemble teams of volunteers to scour the beach for litter, which is commendable. However, this is obviously part of a larger problem involving to a large extent irresponsible fishermen who chuck their empty engine oil containers and other refuse overboard. To their credit, the Maritime Fishermen's has a Clean Oceans campaign to educate fishermen; obviously, though there is a long way to go before the problem is resolved.
Category: Nonprofits & Activism
Tags: MOV02054 URL
Embed Customize
This video shows the neat pile of garbage we collected off the beach on Thanksgiving Day, Oct. 12, 2009, and left by the side of the road for pickup by the municipal authorities. It took the two of...
This video shows the neat pile of garbage we collected off the beach on Thanksgiving Day, Oct. 12, 2009, and left by the side of the road for pickup by the municipal authorities. It took the two of us approximately one hour to assemble this garbage, which littered the beach. We understaand that the locals periodically assemble teams of volunteers to scour the beach for litter, which is commendable. However, this is obviously part of a larger problem involving to a large extent irresponsible fishermen who chuck their empty engine oil containers and other refuse overboard. To their credit, the Maritime Fishermen's has a Clean Oceans campaign to educate fishermen; obviously, though there is a long way to go before the problem is resolved.
Category: Nonprofits & Activism
Tags: MOV02054 URL
Embed Customize
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
